How Does Jaywalking Affect Your Pedestrian Accident Lawsuit?

A pedestrian jaywalking on a highway through heavy traffic in California

A common concern regarding pedestrian accidents is whether crossing the street anywhere in California is permissible. Jaywalking refers to crossing the road in areas not designated for pedestrian crossings. But what are the specific rules, and what are the consequences of breaking them?

California, the most populous state in the U.S. with many bustling urban areas, experiences significant pedestrian traffic. Therefore, understanding whether jaywalking is illegal in California and the associated implications is vital for the safety of pedestrians and drivers.

While the term "jaywalking" often conjures images of pedestrians hastily crossing streets at non-designated spots, the legal dimensions of this issue are far from straightforward, adding an intriguing layer of complexity to the topic.

Understanding Jaywalking & Negligence In Pedestrian Accidents

"Jaywalking" refers to pedestrians crossing the street at unauthorized or unregulated locations, such as between intersections or unmarked points, often disregarding traffic signals. This practice is generally illegal in many areas and can result in fines or penalties if enforced by law. It's hazardous as it disrupts vehicle traffic flow and increases the risk of collisions between pedestrians and vehicles.

It's important to understand that "jaywalking" denotes a specific violation of traffic laws on improper pedestrian crossings. However, the term's relevance can vary based on several factors, such as road conditions, marked crosswalks, and the behavior of drivers and pedestrians. In pedestrian accident cases, "negligence" refers to the failure of a party to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm or injury to a pedestrian.

Negligence is a fundamental concept in personal injury law and is critical in determining fault and liability in accidents, particularly when jaywalking is involved.

To establish negligence in a pedestrian accident case, the following elements typically need to be demonstrated:

Breach Of Duty

The responsible party, the driver, was obliged to exercise reasonable care to avoid harming pedestrians. Breaching this duty might involve speeding, distracted driving, running a red light, or failing to yield the right of way to pedestrians.

Causation

The driver's breach of duty directly caused the accident and subsequent injuries to the pedestrian. It must be demonstrated that the accident occurred due to the driver's actions. If jaywalking is proven, liability for the accident may shift.

Damages

The pedestrian sustained actual injuries or damages due to the accident. These include medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, and other related costs.

If these elements are proven in court, the driver may be found negligent, and the pedestrian might be entitled to compensation for their injuries and damages. It is important to note that pedestrians can also be found negligent, such as if they were jaywalking or behaving in a way that contributed to the accident. In these situations, consulting a lawyer promptly can be beneficial.

The concept of comparative negligence may apply, where both parties share some degree of fault, and the compensation awarded is adjusted based on the extent of each party's responsibility.

How Jaywalking Can Impact Your Pedestrian Accident Case?

The outcome of a pedestrian accident case hinges on the specific details and circumstances surrounding the incident. It is essential to determine the actions of both the driver and the pedestrian at the time of the accident. The driver might not have been the only one violating traffic laws; the pedestrian might have been crossing without having the right-of-way, crossing against a red signal, or crossing outside a designated crosswalk. Such violations by the pedestrian are considered jaywalking and can significantly impact the outcome of their lawsuit and the compensation they may receive.

In any personal injury case, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant's actions caused their injuries. If the pedestrian engages in unlawful behavior, it may reduce or negate the driver's liability for the accident. Consequently, the driver may not be held entirely responsible for the accident, and the compensation awarded to the pedestrian could be adjusted accordingly.

Receiving Compensation In California Pedestrian Accidents

In California, you can still receive financial compensation for a pedestrian accident even if you were partially at fault. However, your settlement amount will be reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to you. Insurance companies will likely scrutinize your actions to reduce their liability.

As a comparative negligence state, California allows for compensation even if you cross the street improperly, provided you can demonstrate that the driver was also at fault. However, this also gives the insurance company leverage to complicate your case and reduce your settlement. Every dollar they successfully reduce is one less to cover your expenses or compensate for your injuries.

Pedestrian accidents rarely present clear-cut cases. Insurance companies often attempt to blame the pedestrian to minimize their payout or avoid paying the claim altogether. If a pedestrian violated any laws during the accident, their ability to secure financial compensation might be compromised.

Hire A Pedestrian Accident Lawyer Immediately

Contacting an experienced pedestrian accident lawyer promptly protects your legal rights. Insurance companies often gather evidence immediately to use against you and weaken your case.

Do not make assumptions about your pedestrian accident case. First, do not assume compensation is out of reach because of your actions during the accident. Second, do not be complacent and think the insurance company will not try to make you the issue in the case. Our experienced attorneys can review your case and defend against any allegations the insurance company may raise.